Besides, we have seen this kind of incident before, not once but several times. The Bank Indonesia arson in 1997 and the blaze that gutted the Government Comptroller Agency (BPKP) in 2000 are believed to be the most glaring attempts to foil criminal investigation. The two fires destroyed many documents related to the misuse of Bank Indonesia liquidity support (BLBI) extended to ailing banks in the Asian financial crisis.

Saturday’s fire gutted floors three to six of the AGO building, where the departments of intelligence, human resources, legal and planning were located. Also affected was the office of prosecutor Pinangki Sirna Malasari, whom the AGO has named a suspect for allegedly accepting US$500,000 in bribes and meeting several times with tycoon Djoko Soegiarto Tjandra.

The bribery case involving Pinangki has come under public scrutiny not only because of her alleged role in the recent scandalous return of fugitive graft convict Djoko to the country, but also due to the magnitude of the case.

Tempo weekly reported that Pinangki held talks with Djoko in Kuala Lumpur last year to offer him help to secure a Supreme Court acquittal. Pinangki reportedly demanded US$100 million for the service, but Djoko only agreed to pay one tenth of the amount. According to the report, Pinangki let Attorney General ST Burhanuddin know about her meeting with Djoko, including through a video call after Djoko agreed to pay $10 million.

It was Pinangki, according to the report, who proposed her friend, lawyer Anita Kolopaking, to represent him. Police have named Anita a suspect and detained her in the case.

The AGO investigation into Pinangki has raised many eyebrows due to its lack of transparency. The Prosecutor Commission, for one, was not given access to Pinangki.

Popular

State-sanctioned intolerance

Jakarta library reopens to packed rooms, long queues

Why EV makers choose Vietnam, not nickel-rich Indonesia