Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsNow, as before, Muhyiddin must spend as much time repairing fissures within the coalition, as parrying attacks from the opposition.
gainst all expectations, Malaysia’s Parliament passed the country’s 2021 budget on the second reading. Following Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul Aziz’s speech to conclude the debate on the budget, Parliamentary Speaker Azhar Harun called for a voice vote. In such a vote, a measure is approved or rejected by MPs calling out their support or disapproval.
The Speaker was satisfied that there were more MPs in favor of the budget and announced that it had passed its second reading. Such a modality poses a lower bar than a bloc vote, where the number of parliamentarians for or against a measure are counted.
While the budget still has to pass a third and final reading scheduled for Dec. 15, this latest development brings Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin’s Perikatan Nasional (PN) administration a step closer to pushing the budget through.
The stakes for Muhyiddin are high. First, at RM322.5 billion, the 2021 budget is Malaysia’s largest ever, and is the centerpiece of his administration’s Covid-19 response. In line with Malaysia’s Westminster tradition, a rejection of the bill would have been tantamount to a loss of confidence in Muhyiddin’s administration. Had the budget bill been defeated, he would have had to resign or request the King to dissolve parliament and call for fresh elections.
At present, the PN administration has the slimmest of majorities. It has 112 in its ranks, against the opposition’s 108. It would only have taken a few no-shows or displays of dissent from government MPs to block the budget and topple the PN government. The previous debates around the structure and content of the budget also showed that there was dissension, both within PN and from across the floor. Sensing Muhyiddin’s vulnerability, a number of aspiring leaders saw blood in the water and sought to capitalize on this. Yet, conscious of the King’s appeal to parliamentarians to unite to pass the budget, they did not want to appear too eager to tip the apple-cart.
While all ministers and deputy ministers within the PN coalition supported the budget regardless of their party affiliation, there were criticisms of the budget from both sides of the floor. In a refreshing change of tone, the debates were technical and centerd on policy matters such as the ability of the public to access funds in their retirement accounts, the tenure and extent of loan moratoria, and the budget for a government agency tasked with communication and outreach.
That said, much of the differences over the form and content of the budget were a reflection of deeper-seated divisions.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.