“We should review the Rp 33 trillion (US$2.3 billion) we spend annually on fertilizer subsidies because they seem to be totally ineffective at increasing farm productivity,” the President said.

It is indeed rather strange that as an agrarian country with a population of about 270 million, Indonesia still depends, to varying degrees, on imports not only for rice, the national staple, but also for maize and most horticultural products. This food deficit has caused a vicious cycle as the government is often forced to allow imports, especially for the annual peak demand periods of the Islamic fasting month and Idul Fitri holidays in order to keep prices down.

To protect domestic farmers, imports have to be controlled with quotas for specially appointed importers. But the bureaucratic process of appointing importers and distributing quotas has always been notorious for corrupt practices.     

While the President’s observation about wasteful fertilizer subsidies is absolutely right, we wonder why it took so long for him to realize the miserable failure of his agricultural policies. Although he has not admitted it, the bitter fact is that he has failed to achieve the production targets of all main food commodities he set at the outset of his first term in October 2014.

The latest uproar about the steep rise in the price of soybean, the basic material for very popular tempeh and tofu snacks, only reconfirmed that the country still depended on imports for 80 percent of its annual soybean consumption, whereas Jokowi promised to achieve self-sufficiency in 2016.

Domestic and foreign agricultural researchers, including those of the Asian Development Bank, World Bank and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, have been warning for several years that fertilizer subsidies, which account for more than 30 percent of total agricultural subsidies, not only were ineffective at increasing farm productivity, but had also been wasted through misappropriation due to the wide price differences (often as much as 40 to 50 percent) between subsidized and non-subsidized fertilizers.

Popular

Much ado about asset forfeiture

Mass poisonings cast doubt on free meals reforms

New data rules could unlock cross-border data flows