The country’s regulations have turned verified emission reductions into tradable assets, with a primary registry under environmental authorities and a secondary exchange under financial supervision.

On paper, carbon looks like infrastructure ready capital; in practice, trading volumes, participants and prices suggest an economically dormant market rather than a vibrant one, even with the existence of carbon pricing in the country.

The regulation matters as carbon value sits at the intersection of planet, people, and profit. In principle, credible carbon prices can finance ecological restoration, support green jobs and raise community incomes, especially for forest dependent groups.

However, in reality, weak demand, shallow liquidity and patchy data risk turning carbon markets into fragile narratives that do little to cut emissions or share benefits fairly. Indonesia risks having a carbon market that exists in regulation but fails to deliver meaningful environmental or economic benefits. The country is also facing external pressure from global market that call for urgent reform.

The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism is turning robust carbon accounting into a condition of market access for exporters in carbon intensive sectors. Carbon disclosures are shifting from “nice to have” CSR language to hard commercial necessity, while global evidence shows pricing coverage and levels still below what is needed for Paris aligned decarbonization.

On the other hand, accountants have become decisive. Carbon units only hold meaningful value if they can be measured, recognized, disclosed and assured with credibility.

Indonesia is moving in the right direction on disclosure and assurance through new sustainability and assurance standards aligned with international frameworks. Yet the toughest gaps lie in recognition, measurement and skills: no dedicated global standard governs how to account for carbon credits, Scope 3 data are scarce and assurance over emissions requires competencies far beyond conventional bookkeeping.

The core message is simple: standards alone do not create integrity. Indonesian accountants must build the technical capacity to apply them and the professional scepticism to defend them.

Carbon can become an accountable capital for ecological recovery, community welfare, and durable profit. If Indonesia does not succeed, the country risks maintaining a carbon market that is rich in regulation, poor in value and vulnerable to the very greenwashing it was meant to prevent.

Popular

Firefighter dies battling blaze at illegal Jakarta dumpsite

Fighting forest fires starts with communities

Trump wants to close missions in Indonesia, Japan and Canada, sources say