The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe Bayan valuation mystery: When markets need answers, not speculation
When a $26 billion giant is targeted for $4.8 billion, the real casualty isn’t price—it’s trust.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Set as preferred source
Coal is loaded onto barges at a jetty operated by the group along the Kedang Kepala River in Senyiur village, East Kutai regency, East Kalimantan, in this file photo. (Courtesy of/PT Bayan Reources)
T
here is a mystery unfolding in Indonesia’s capital market. PT Bayan Resources is one of the nation’s largest listed companies, commanding a quoted market capitalization of roughly US$26 billion. Yet according to Bloomberg, an entity controlled by politically connected businessman Andi Syamsuddin Arsyad, better known as Haji Isam, offered approximately $3 billion for a 62 percent controlling stake.
The arithmetic is unsparing: if 62 percent is worth $3 billion, the offer implies an equity valuation of roughly $4.8 billion for the entire enterprise.
The public exchange quotes roughly $26 billion; the private offer implies roughly $4.8 billion. That is an 80-percent divergence. One corporate entity, two irreconcilable signals of worth.
Why?
This is the core of the Bayan valuation mystery. The purpose here is not to declare which valuation is correct, nor can outside observers fully parse what lies behind the proposed transaction.
Speculating on the motives of buyer or seller serves little purpose, and a valuation gap does not, in itself, signal impropriety. Controlling stakes and open-market equity floats operate under fundamentally different mechanics.
Yet Bayan is no private enterprise. Its sheer weight anchors Indonesia’s equity benchmarks. A discrepancy of this scale cannot simply be dismissed as a private negotiation behind closed doors; it strikes at the heart of investor confidence in the market mechanism itself.
