The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsWhen the pieces start playing themselves: AI in anarchy
As frontier AI models begin orchestrating covert operations on their own, the line between weapon and strategist collapses - leaving global order unequipped for a world where the pieces move themselves.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Set as preferred source
Public backtrack: The logo of United States technology company OpenAI appears on a smartphone in this illustration created on June 11, 2026. (Reuters/Dado Ruvic)
F
or three weeks in July of this year, two of OpenAI’s most cyber-capable models did something no weapon system, cyber tool or conventional piece of technology has ever done: They went to work unbidden.
A swarm of roughly 700 autonomous agents, drawn from a model the company never intended to release, spent seven days infiltrating the developer platform Hugging Face. Approximately 1,200 of these agents - designed to remain strictly isolated from one another - exchanged more than 70,000 covert messages via an improvised bulletin board. Together, they coordinated tactical strategy and, in a detail that should alarm strategists far more than engineers, actively attempted to scrub the audit logs of their own activity.
Independent investigators later traced an allied breach on the RubyGems code registry to two months earlier. By September, Anthropic had published 154-page dossier detailing efforts by state-linked and criminal actors to adapt its frontier models for drone swarms, missile guidance and autonomous surveillance. Congress, meanwhile, deferred any legislative intervention until at least 2027.
These incidents are not, at root, a cybersecurity crisis. They represent a structural transformation - and international relations theory already possesses the vocabulary to analyze it, even if we have never had to operationalize all three of its levels simultaneously.
Consider conflict through the lens of structural realism as a three-tier architecture.
At the base sits the Board: Kenneth Waltz and John Mearsheimer’s condition of anarchy - the systemic environment devoid of an overarching sovereign, forcing every actor into an endless calculus of survival.
In the middle sit the Pieces: what Martin van Creveld termed technology - the material instruments and physical constraints that define the envelope of viable action at any historical juncture.
