The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsLet Bocelli’s music become a call for peace, not division
Instead of letting Andrea Bocelli’s upcoming shows in Indonesia divide the country, we should transform his stage into an uncompromising global platform for Palestinian justice and humanitarian solidarity.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Italian tenor Andrea Bocelli, who learned to play several musical instruments from an early age, plays the flute in this undated photo. (Courtesy of Romanza 30th Anniversary World Tour/-)
T
he controversy surrounding Andrea Bocelli’s planned concerts in Indonesia presents a question far larger than the arrival of an internationally acclaimed tenor. It asks whether art and culture can still serve humanity in an era increasingly fractured by armed conflict, entrenched political loyalties and profound moral distrust across communities worldwide.
Bocelli is scheduled to perform at the historic sanctuary of Borobudur on Oct. 31 and in Jakarta on Nov. 3 as part of his Romanza 30th Anniversary World Tour. The Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) has urged the cancellation of both performances.
The religious body points specifically to the Italian singer’s participation in a 2010 Los Angeles fundraising event connected to the Israel Defense Forces as well as his commercial concert in Tel Aviv in 2022. The council contends that hosting him on national soil directly contradicts Indonesia’s constitutional opposition to colonialism and its enduring solidarity with the Palestinian people. This objection warrants serious and deliberate consideration.
For Indonesians, Palestine is never a distant geopolitical abstraction or a casual diplomatic stance. It represents an existential moral commitment woven into the nation’s history, constitutional identity and collective conscience. Yet this sharp dispute also invites an alternative question. Rather than viewing the impending performances solely through the narrow lens of political affiliation, can this controversy become an entry point for an ambitious humanitarian initiative?
Raising this question does not mean dismissing the MUI’s legitimate concerns, excusing Bocelli’s past public appearances or subordinating the grave suffering of Palestinians to the commercial priorities of the international entertainment industry. Rather, it acknowledges that sustainable peacebuilding requires modern societies to transform moments of ideological division into opportunities for substantive moral action.
Indonesia’s steadfast support for Palestine rests on bedrock constitutional principles that promote independence as the inalienable right of all nations and a permanent end to colonialism all over the world. This mandate is not empty diplomatic rhetoric. It serves as an explicit philosophical statement regarding the kind of international civilization Indonesia aspires to build.
The conclusion remains clear: Genuine peace cannot be reduced to a symbolic ceasefire announcement, an orchestrated diplomatic photograph or the quiet restoration of regional commerce. A durable peace must systematically address the root conditions that make violence, dispossession and territorial domination possible.
