The Jakarta Post
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsFinancial sector overhaul
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
T
he fragmentary statements made by the government over the past three weeks on plans to reform the financial sector could cause confusion in an industry already mired in high uncertainty.
In late August, the Finance Ministry announced that the government was planning a general reform of the financial system through a regulation in lieu of law (Perppu) covering mainly three institutions: Bank Indonesia, the Financial Services Authority (0JK) and the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS).
Then, in early September, the government and the House of Representatives suddenly announced an agreement to deliberate a bill to amend the 1999 Bank Indonesia Law. The House-initiated bill would, among other things, move the OJK’s banking supervision powers back to BI so that the central bank would once again be in charge of all banking industry supervision. It would also expand BI’s mandate to drive economic growth and give the minister of finance a bigger role in monetary policy.
But early last week, the Finance Ministry announced it was preparing an omnibus bill that would revise virtually all laws governing the whole financial sector, including bank and non-bank institutions, the capital market and the three main institutions, BI, the OJK and the LPS, in charge of financial sector stability. Prominent among the laws to be revised is the 2016 Law on the Prevention and Resolution of a Financial System Crisis (PPKSK Law).
This law clarifies the responsibilities of the agencies involved in crisis management. It also establishes a committee in charge of managing the stability of the financial sector (KSSK), which comprises the finance minister (coordinator) and the heads of BI, the OJK and the LPS.
The finance ministry explained that the PPKSK Law had to be revised because it covered risks and financial distress only in banks but not in non-bank institutions, such as insurance firms and pension funds. As it happened, three major life insurance companies are now facing financial distress due in part to fraud and various other forms of bad governance.
Our question is, what is the point of putting the 1999 BI Law amendment on top of the House legislation agenda now, while the Finance Ministry is preparing an omnibus bill to govern the whole financial sector?
