Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsSubsidizing the commodity benefits producers, whose income is guaranteed, and the wealthy, who pay the same price as the poor.
he single-price policy for all domestically produced, palm-fruit-based cooking oil came into force last week with little to no debate. To make cooking oil – an important staple in local cuisine – affordable to everyone, the government has fixed the price at Rp 14,000 (97 US cents) a liter nationwide for the next six months.
Without a thorough public discussion, we cannot know whether this is a good policy or not.
Soaring global prices of palm oil, the main ingredient for cooking oil in Indonesia, mean producers would rather sell abroad than on a home market where they cannot sell at market price.
Under the single-price policy, they are obliged to supply 1.5 billion liters of cooking oil at the government-set price, but they will be compensated handsomely.
It is a decision that makes both consumers and producers happy, while the government has no qualms about picking up the Rp 7.6 trillion bill for the subsidy.
But is it a good economic decision? Is it worth the price?
Where are the economists when we need them? Some have been coopted by the government, but what about the others? Their silence suggests either they have all gone socialist or they keep silent to avoid being bullied on social media for speaking against a populist policy.
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.