Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsCan't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsA presidential regulation classifying "LGBTQ culture” as a nonmilitary threat has drawn sharp criticism from civil society groups, who warn it could provide legal and political justification for further criminalizing the vulnerable minority, while lawmakers and religious groups defend the policy as necessary to “safeguard” national resilience.
Residents sign a white banner during an anti-LGBT rally on June 21 in Padang, West Sumatra. The event, organized by the West Sumatra administration, the West Sumatra Police and the Minangkabau Traditional Council (LKAAM), invited participants to sign a one-kilometer-long white banner as part of a declaration opposing the LGBT community. Organizers also pledged to take action against LGBT individuals through customary law and called for them to be “eradicated“ or expelled from the Minangkabau land. (Antara/Fitra Yogi)
presidential regulation classifying LGBTQ “culture” as a nonmilitary threat has drawn sharp criticism from civil society groups, who warn it could provide legal and political justification for further criminalizing the vulnerable minority, while lawmakers and religious groups defend the policy as necessary to “safeguard” national resilience.
As anti-LGBTQ sentiment intensified across Indonesia during June’s Pride Month, public attention turned to the presidential regulation (Perpres) on national defense policy issued by President Prabowo Subianto last October.
The 70-page regulation identifies "the promotion of LGBTQ culture” as a nonmilitary threat, alongside illegal trafficking, natural resource theft, terrorism, atheism and radicalism.
It defines nonmilitary threats as unarmed activities that endanger state sovereignty, territorial integrity and public safety, and instructs relevant ministries, state institutions and regional administrations outside the defense sector to respond to such threats.
But rights groups argue that by framing LGBTQ identity and advocacy as threats to national security, the regulation risks legitimizing further discrimination against an already marginalized community.
“The presidential regulation provides new legitimation both for the central government and regional administrations to enact legislation that penalizes and discriminates against LGBTQ individuals merely because of their identities,” Legal Aid Institute for the People (LBHM) executive director Albert Wirya told The Jakarta Post on Tuesday.
Read also: Rights groups oppose calls to criminalize LGBTQ people
Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.
Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.