TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsLess testing was a choice, so is the future
A thirty-year silence from nuclear testing was not an accident of history—it was a fragile choice that the world must urgently choose to keep.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Set as preferred source
Nuclear nixed: A woman holds up a placard reading, “The ocean is not a trash bin for nuclear waste!“ during a protest on Aug. 22, 2023, in central Seoul. (Reuters/Kim Hong-Ji)
T
he risk of nuclear war does not hinge on a single decision. It accumulates test by test, each detonation nudging the world closer to catastrophe. That escalation carries a lasting human toll: every blast scars the land and waters, leaving nearby communities to bear the burden across generations, long after the dust settles.
The International Day against Nuclear Tests (IDANT) exists because these dangers remain part of our living history, and because governments face the exact same choice every year.
There was a time when the ground shook routinely. For four decades, the Semipalatinsk test site bore the brunt of it, until its closure 35 years ago finally brought quiet to the Kazakh steppe.
That closure signaled a broader turn away from nuclear testing. Before the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT) opened for signature in 1996, nations conducted more than 2,000 explosive tests. Since then, fewer than a dozen.
Those tremors did not fade by accident. It was a deliberate choice—reaffirmed by governments year after year. But unlike a fixed historical fact, a political choice can always be undone. It must not be.
Peace is something we build, maintain and verify. At the heart of that effort is a global network of over 300 monitoring stations and laboratories across 90-plus countries, listening to the earth around the clock.
The International Monitoring System can pinpoint an explosion equivalent to just 500 tonnes of TNT—roughly 3 percent of the yield at Hiroshima. It detected every declared test by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, including the smallest. The system does not ask the world to run on blind trust; it gives the world the means to verify.
