TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Lots of fur, few purrs as critics claw 'Cats' musical film
A film adaptation of hit stage musical "Cats" hits cinemas this week but critics have not exactly been purring with delight.
Change Size
A film adaptation of hit stage musical 'Cats' hits cinemas this week but critics have not exactly been purring with delight. (YouTube/File)
A film adaptation of hit stage musical Cats hits cinemas this week but critics have not exactly been purring with delight.
From "cat-tastrophic" to "the worst thing to happen to cats since dogs", most reviews have been far from kind, with disapproval ranging over the star-studded cast's computer-generated furry looks, oversized sets and plot.
As of Thursday, 18 percent of 97 reviews collected on the Rotten Tomatoes website were positive.
Featuring Taylor Swift, Judi Dench, Ian McKellen, Jennifer Hudson, Idris Elba and James Corden, Cats sparked some negative reaction over the characters' appearances when its trailer dropped in July.
Adapted from composer Andrew Lloyd Webber's musical and directed by Oscar winner Tom Hooper, the movie shows the actors' faces while their bodies appear to be covered in fur.
"The real issue is the distracting and disturbing 'digital fur technology'," Tara Brady wrote for The Irish Times. "Every time Cats settles into an admittedly avant-garde shape, an ear twitches or a tail flicks and you’re back thinking about how ghastly the actual cats look."
Variety's Peter Debruge called it an "outlandishly tacky interpretation".
"From the first shot ... to the last, 'Cats' hurts the eyes and, yes, the ears, as nearly all the musical numbers ... have been twisted into campy, awards-grubbing cameos for big-name stars in bad-CG cat drag."
Read also: Taylor Swift, Andrew Lloyd Webber write new 'Cats' song for musical film
The Hollywood Reporter's David Rooney dubbed the film "cat-tastrophic".
"In addition to the generally off-putting appearance of the cats, the proportions are all wrong with respect to their surrounding environment," he said. "Sometimes they go from appearing minuscule to giant-size within the same scene."
Based on the poems by T.S. Eliot, Cats follows the Jellicles group of felines, who annually decide who will ascend to the Heaviside Layer. The musical opened in London in 1981, becoming one of the longest-running shows in the West End and Broadway.
Hooper, known for The King's Speech and Les Miserables, said he worked on the characters' feline designs after initial reaction to the trailer. At Monday's premiere, he told Variety he had completed the movie only the previous day.
"I finished it at 8 a.m. yesterday after 36 hours in a row. I just put the finishing touches on. So, I'm very happy to be here with it fully finished," Variety quoted Hooper saying.
Several critics praised the film's choreography and performances.
USA Today's Brian Truitt called Cats an "utterly absurd yet oddly charming movie" while Deadline's Pete Hammond said it was a "welcome treat this holiday season".
"The strength of this version is in its actors, and they are all perfectly chosen and deliver on all four paws," Hammond wrote.
