TheJakartaPost

Please Update your browser

Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.

Jakarta Post

Govt urged to protect Munir case witnesses

A human rights group has called on the state apparatus to protect the remaining witnesses in the case of the murder of activist Munir Said Thalib, following the untimely death of Raymon “Ongen” Latuihamallo on Wednesday

Rabby Pramudatama and Bagus BT Saragih (The Jakarta Post)
Jakarta
Fri, May 4, 2012 Published on May. 4, 2012 Published on 2012-05-04T07:41:25+07:00

Change text size

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

A

human rights group has called on the state apparatus to protect the remaining witnesses in the case of the murder of activist Munir Said Thalib, following the untimely death of Raymon “Ongen” Latuihamallo on Wednesday.

Ongen was among only a few witnesses who testified on the death of Munir, who was poisoned on a flight en route to the Netherlands.

“We ask the National Police and the Witness and Victim Protection Agency [LPSK] to pay special attention to the remaining witnesses in the case,” said Choirul Anam, secretary-general of the Solidarity Committee for Munir (Kasum).

He made the call following the death of Ongen.

Ongen, 56, reportedly died of a heart attack on Wednesday.

“He suddenly collapsed while on his way home,” Ongen’s wife, Eta Latuihamallo, said as reported by kompas.com on Thursday.

Eta said Ongen, who was driving her and their daughter home from Mangga Dua in North Jakarta, suddenly lost control of the car near Blok M in South Jakarta.

“He tried to pull on the hand brake twice,” she added.

Eta appealed to local residents for help and they rushed Ongen to Pertamina Central Hospital but “it was too late”.

Anam said the President and the Attorney General’s Office (AGO) would find it hard to reopen the Munir case if they did not protect the remaining witnesses.

He said some of the other witnesses in the same case had also died of heart attacks.

“One of them was Bijah Subiyakto, former deputy VII of the National Intelligence Agency (BIN),” Anam told The Jakarta Post on Thursday.

He said Kasum strongly believed that Bijah had known a great deal about Munir’s murder, as he had met with Munir only a month before the latter died. “The fact that another witness has died, supposedly from a heart attack, makes us suspicious that there are real efforts to weaken the case,” he said.

“These efforts are specifically aimed at concealing information from key witnesses.”

If Ongen was murdered, he added, then the perpetrator would have to have been a person with senior intelligence skills, who operated with a clear target and a brilliant exit strategy.

Ongen was linked to Munir, who died of arsenic poisoning on his way from Jakarta to the Netherlands aboard Garuda Indonesia flight number GA 974 in 2004.

Ongen was seen talking to Munir and the case’s original defendant — Garuda pilot Pollycarpus Priyanto — at a coffee shop in Singapore’s Changi Airport before the flight.

Ongen was not the last of the key witnesses; several more remain alive, according to Anam.

“There is Budi Santoso, a witness who gave fundamental and clear testimony about the involvement of BIN in the case,” he said.

Budi, however, did not appear in court when he testified against Pollycarpus. Budi’s testimony was the only one that implicated Muchdi PR, a former BIN deputy chief, who was charged with masterminding Munir’s murder.

Anam said that although he did not know Budi’s current whereabouts, he believed that Budi was still alive and had pivotal information about the case.

He said that Budi’s last-known whereabouts were in Pakistan, where he had sought refuge for safety reasons.

Anam claimed that in spite of the deaths of these two witnesses, he along with KASUM had gathered several new pieces of evidence, such as a rebuttal of Muchdi’s alibi, Muchdi declaring that he had been on duty in Malaysia at the time of Munir’s killing.

“After meeting with BIN at several adjudication sessions at the Central Information Commission (KIP), it turned out that the intelligence agency did not possess a letter of assignment ordering Muchdi to go to Malaysia.”

 

Raymond “Ongen” Latuihamalo

September 2004
Raymond “Ongen” Latuihamalo is believed to have met Munir during a stopover at Singapore’s Changi Airport en route to the Netherlands.

Sept. 7, 2004
Munir died from arsenic poisoning on board Garuda flight 974 from Singapore to Amsterdam.

March 30, 2007
Police questioned Ongen as a witness for the first time. The police questioned him again upon his return from the Netherlands on May 16.

May 2007

Police announced the emergence of new evidence, including a new key witness named Ongen, which led to Pollycarpus being brought before judges for a second time. Ongen was kept under police protection along with several other witnesses.

June 2007
Ongen confirmed that he saw Munir on his September 2004 flight to the Netherlands, but denied being an acquaintance of the rights activist. He declined to confirm that the man he was talking about was Garuda pilot
Pollycarpus Budihari Priyanto.

Aug. 16, 2007
Witnesses Joseph Ririmase, Asrini Utami Putri and Ongen — all passengers on the same flight as Munir and Pollycarpus — testified that they all saw Pollycarpus drink at a cafe with Munir while in Changi.

Aug. 23, 2007
Ongen denied most of the statements attributed to him in his police statement, saying that a police investigator, Mathius Salempang, had forced him to sign it.

He recanted his earlier statement, that he saw Pollycarpus carrying two cups containing drinks at the Coffee Bean Cafe in Singapore’s Changi Airport and saw Pollycarpus chatting with Munir. Ongen said in court he did not know who Pollycarpus was at that time.

Aug. 29, 2007
Mathius Salempang defended the procedures used in the interrogation of key witnesses in the Munir case who had now retracted testimony.

He added that he was not part of the investigation team in the days following because he had meetings with expert witnesses for the case.

“I was also not there when he [Ongen] signed the statement. How could I have threatened him?” Mathius said.

Jan. 9, 2008
Ongen was supposed to testify at one of the hearings in the trial at the Central Jakarta District Court, but failed to appear. He gave no reason for his absence.

Your Opinion Matters

Share your experiences, suggestions, and any issues you've encountered on The Jakarta Post. We're here to listen.

Enter at least 30 characters
0 / 30

Thank You

Thank you for sharing your thoughts. We appreciate your feedback.

Share options

Quickly share this news with your network—keep everyone informed with just a single click!

Change text size options

Customize your reading experience by adjusting the text size to small, medium, or large—find what’s most comfortable for you.

Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone

Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!

Continue in the app

Get the best experience—faster access, exclusive features, and a seamless way to stay updated.