TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsAnalysis: The wiretapping loophole: A hasty future for Indonesian law
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Illustration of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and Criminal Law Procedures Code (KUHAP). (kompas.com/Palupi Annisa Auliani)
A
fter last month's controversial passage of the revised Criminal Law Procedures Code (KUHAP) bill, concerns have emerged regarding a significant legal loophole: wiretaps. Activists say that if left unchecked, law enforcement agencies like the National Police will have leeway to wiretap anyone at any time without formal mechanisms and restrictions once the KUHAP comes into force on Jan. 2.
Under Article 136(1) of the newly passed bill, "investigators may conduct wiretapping for an investigation", while the following section, Article 136(2), states that a separate law will regulate eavesdropping. However, no wiretapping law exists yet, creating a legal void that is ripe for abuse in future investigations.
House of Representatives Commission III chair Habiburokhman, who oversaw the drafting of the KUHAP bill, dismissed these fears, saying this legal gap was "by design". The lawmaker, who hails from the ruling Gerindra Party, made assurances that a majority of House members agreed that wiretaps must be carried out carefully and only with court permission, and that these safeguards would be stipulated in a forthcoming wiretapping law.
However, in the absence of a draft law open to public scrutiny, concerns are growing that this new law will not be enacted before the KUHAP comes into force. While last week saw some development at the latest House plenary session, where the bill was introduced for inclusion in the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas), no actual deliberation has taken place. With the legislature now in recess until Jan. 12, it is highly unlikely that a draft wiretapping law will be completed before the new KUHAP is implemented.
In the meantime, the House Legislation Body (Baleg) has been tapped as caretaker of the wiretapping bill. This marks a shift in responsibility, as the KUHAP was deliberated and ratified by House Commission III, which oversees law enforcement, while Baleg is known as the legislature's "fast track" and the preferred channel for expediting passage of a bill.
This was demonstrated earlier this year when Baleg revised and approved the Mining Law in just three days. Regardless of legislative efficiency, the rushed process invited more criticism than praise for its lack of public participation, expert consultation, and clear urgency.
The new Mining Law allows religious organizations, small and medium enterprises (SMEs), and cooperatives to obtain mining rights, fueling accusations that the revised legislation was a transactional move to secure political support from mass organizations.
