TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search results
Popular Reads
Top Results
No results found. Please check your search term and try again
Can't find what you're looking for?
View all search resultsThe darkness of monologue: Grid fragility as communication failure
Frequent blackouts aren't just engineering failures. They are the cost of a bureaucratic monologue that treats energy security as a state secret.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
A vendor prepares drinks for customers in the dim light of candles on May 23, 2026, during a power outage in Nagari Kasang, Padang Pariaman regency, West Sumatra. (Antara/Fitra Yogi)
W
hen the lights went out across parts of Sumatra last month, followed by load shedding across the Java-Bali grid of state electricity firm PLN last week, the instinctive response was familiar: Find the broken point. Was it a tripped transmission line, a malfunctioning generator or a technical fault somewhere within the vast network architecture?
Yet over years of working across energy data, policy discussions and public communication, I have learned that infrastructure rarely fails in isolation. Beneath every technical disruption is a social story about institutions, incentives and the ways information is shared or withheld.
What we witnessed recently was not merely an electrical disturbance. It was a symptom of a system under strain from administrative bottlenecks and rigid structures, made more fragile by a long-standing tendency to keep energy governance behind closed institutional doors.
In that sense, Indonesia’s power disruptions reveal an uncomfortable truth: Grid resilience is not just about steel, coal or reserve margins; it is about trust.
For years, particularly during the 35,000-megawatt landmark project expansion over the past decade, the dominant narrative surrounding the national power system was one of abundance. The country supposedly possessed ample, even excessive, generating capacity. "Overcapacity" became less of a technical description and more of an institutional reassurance.
But narratives, when repeated often enough, harden into assumptions.
Quietly, conditions shifted: Post-pandemic demand recovered, operational constraints tightened, margins narrowed. The buffer that once appeared comfortable gradually evaporated while the public narrative remained entirely unchanged.
