TheJakartaPost
Please Update your browser
Your browser is out of date, and may not be compatible with our website. A list of the most popular web browsers can be found below.
Just click on the icons to get to the download page.
Why boat-sinking policy is controversial
The boat-sinking policy has become controversial since Susi took command of the ministry in 2014. One reason is that it involves foreign-flagged vessels whose flag states have long complained about the measure.
Change text size
Gift Premium Articles
to Anyone
Share the best of The Jakarta Post with friends, family, or colleagues. As a subscriber, you can gift 3 to 5 articles each month that anyone can read—no subscription needed!
Sink them down: Indonesian authorities destroy seven of 75 foreign illegal fishing vessels in the waters off Belawan in Medan, North Sumatra province, on April 1 2017. (AFP/Gatha Ginting)
I
ssues related to the sinking of fishing boats made headlines again after Coordinating Maritime Affairs Minister Luhut Pandjaitan and Vice President Jusuf Kalla demanded recently that Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Minister Susi Pudjiastuti end the policy.
Instead, she was instructed to focus on fish production to boost the country’s fish exports. She reiterated that boat sinking was not her policy and that she just faithfully made decisions based on a court verdict.
The boat-sinking policy has become controversial since Susi took command of the ministry in 2014. One reason is that it involves foreign-flagged vessels whose flag states have long complained about the measure.
Kalla mentioned that he received many objections from the flag states regarding the problem.
The fact that the flag states continuously protest the government over the severe actions — bombed or set ablaze — against their fishing vessels indicates loopholes in our judicial system, especially regarding the shipping business. Of course, no country can dictate their interests to us on the matter.
Since shipping is a transboundary business in which a massive labyrinth of international regulations and best practices manage it and its players, however, we cannot regulate our national judicial system pertaining to the cases, which entail ships in total absence of the international shipping perspective. So, what are the loopholes in the fishing boat-sinking policy from an international shipping point of view?
According to the international practice, a ship — fishing boat, freighter, tanker or others — can be detained only through a court verdict and request for its detention should be filed by the eligible parties for the ship in question such as the creditor, vendor or suppliers.
